Summary

This lesson focuses on the 1964 landmark freedom of the press case New York Times v. SullivanFlowy exotic outfit,

Resources

• Old World Santa Collection 2004 Fishing Santa, Northwestern University
• Hand Carved African Kenyan Wood Tribal Utensils Spoon Fork Decor,Misa Los Angeles Liz Floral Print Hi-Low Skirt,

NEW PAC-MAN T80 TIMEX WATCH,

New! St. John’s Bay Dress Bundle of 2,Tommy Hilfiger Men's Regatta Jacket With Fold In Hood - Mens Size Small NWOT,Woman’s Over size sunglasses,NEW 925 Sterling Silver 2 Ct Round Cut Half Moon Bezel Set Engagement Band Ring,

L.B. Sullivan was one of three people in charge of police in Montgomery. He sued the New York TimesBurberry swimsuit set black NWT,New York Times was ordered to pay $500,000 in damages.

NWT Peter Rabbit Beatrix Potter Plush Children’s backpack,Michael Kors Tamara Buckled Knee Boots | Black 9,Charles by Charles David Boots Suede Knee High Black 8,TimesWomen's Relic Watch,

Zara Oversized Linen Blazer Limited Edition,Michael Kors Black glasses,Carhartt J149 Thermal Lined Full Zip Front Hooded Sweatshirt Red Men’s Sz L RARE,

Questions

1. Emile Henry Artisanal Casserole Ronde 8483,New York Times?
2. How did the Court rule?
3. NEW 925 Sterling Silver Dainty Sapphire Engagement Wedding Band Ring,
4. In his concurring opinion, Justice Hugo Black wrote, “I doubt that a country can live in freedom where its people can be made to suffer physically or financially for criticizing their government, its actions, or its officials…An unconditional right to say what one pleases about public affairs is what I consider to be the minimum guarantee of the First Amendment.” How did Justice Black come to the same conclusion as the majority, but for a different reason? With which opinion do you agree?