Summary

This lesson focuses on the 1964 landmark freedom of the press case New York Times v. SullivanNWB Thalia Sodi Livy Platform Dress Sandals,

Resources

• Paul Green 5.5/8 Pewter Leather Espadrille S2-13, Northwestern University
• Fossil Gen 5 Carlyle HR Smartwatch - Dark Brown Leather w/ charger included,NWOT Sundance Tiered Silk Skirt 2P Lined,

Lucky Brand Fausst Almond Toe Ankle Boots Size-6-1/2m,

Maaji multicolor reversible bikini top Womens size small,Cupshe Red Stripe Triangle Low Waisted Bikini Set Size XL,1998 Mattel Classic Chatty Cathy Repo doll,VTG 1950s Plaid Quilted Circle Skirt Sz S W25.5,

L.B. Sullivan was one of three people in charge of police in Montgomery. He sued the New York TimesFloral Print 2 Piece Bathing Suit,New York Times was ordered to pay $500,000 in damages.

J. McLaughlin Ivory White Cigarette Clutch,All leather | Clutch | Black/Gold snakeskin,NEW Striped Rib Tie Back Bikini Set Size Small,TimesAGOLDE BALLON SLEEVE TURTLENECK SWEATSHIRT IN ZOMBIE SZ S,

Y2K staple Vintage Dooney & Bourke hand bag,MCM × EKOCYCLE x WILL.I.AM Mini-backpack,AGOLDE BALLOON SLEEVE TURTLENECK SWEATSHIRT IN ZOMBIE SZ M,

Questions

1. Black PRADA Flats / Loafers,New York Times?
2. How did the Court rule?
3. Aidan Mattox Red Mermaid Lace cocktail dress,
4. In his concurring opinion, Justice Hugo Black wrote, “I doubt that a country can live in freedom where its people can be made to suffer physically or financially for criticizing their government, its actions, or its officials…An unconditional right to say what one pleases about public affairs is what I consider to be the minimum guarantee of the First Amendment.” How did Justice Black come to the same conclusion as the majority, but for a different reason? With which opinion do you agree?